Wednesday, October 8, 2014

Citizen Motorcyclist reviews the 2014 Harley Davidson Sportster 1200 Touring.



Harley Davidson developed this motorcycle to provide a touring-like experience to more riders, such as riders who feel the touring machines are too large for them. To be sure, a Road Glide or Electra Glide are large machines. The Dyna Switchback, which I have previously reviewed, is smaller than these machines, but the touring Sportster is smaller still. As with all reviews, I aim to talk about its suitability as a commuting motorcycle.

The bike is a small one. It is also very light, as getting it up and off of the side stand was very easy. The handlebars on my specific test model were a little high and back, but bars can be swapped relatively easily. The seat is comfortable enough, and the top of the windscreen is below my line of sight. Hand controls are within reach of my fingers, and they are quickly mastered. The bike's saddlebags are decent, but smaller than what I would like for commuting. A laptop bag is certainly too large, as are many insulated lunch bags/totes. Several coffee thermoses would fit, so there is a saving grace with caffeine supply.

Out on the road, the performance of the bike does not disappoint. The powerful 1200cc engine on a light frame means the bike moves when that throttle is twisted. I took the bike on a short test ride in an empty parking lot and I found that it has generous lean angles before the peg feelers touch asphalt. The "half-floorboard" pegs are slightly elongated pegs, but comfortable enough with my boots. Their position is standard or mid-mounting, and my legs felt a bit cramped very easily. Street riding did not help matters, as my feet felt like they had to travel a long distance from peg to ground. Still, riding at 45 mph was reasonably comfortable, except for the small leg room.

Highway riding is where I became unhappy with the machine. As speeds went past 60 mph, the wind screen seemed to hinder more than it helped. The wind came off the top of the glass and onto my helmet, buffeting it heavily. It also came around the sides of the windshield and pushed against my torso. This wind pressure, coupled with the cramped seating position, made it an unpleasant experience.

When I voiced these concerns to the dealership salesperson, I was shown an extensive catalog of items that could be used to improve the experience. To be sure, a larger windshield, larger saddlebags, and a different handlebar would have improved the experience, but I would save thousands by starting with a Sportster 1200C and adding the desired items to it, since its pegs are more comfortable to me. I am 5'11", so my dimensions are not what Harley was targeting for the 1200 touring model. A smaller rider would likely have a more enjoyable experience, but the small saddlebag problem would still exist.

My overall opinion is that this bike would not be an ideal commuting motorcycle. I think Harley designed this bike to attract more female riders, or riders whose dimensions are smaller than the riders who prefer their larger machines. I would pick a Road King over this Sportster, but again that is based on opinion and fitness for what I want.

Until next time, keep the rubber side down and your knees in the wind.

Thursday, March 6, 2014

Citizen Motorcyclist Reviews 2006 Yamaha Road Star Warrior





                I had the opportunity to ride a friend’s Road Star Warrior a few years ago. The experience was similar to that of the Sportster 1200, but different enough to warrant its own review. Like the 1200, the Warrior has tons of torque available almost from idle, but the Warrior manages to refine it and make it easier to use. Whereas the Sportster felt like it wanted to squirt out from under the rider, the Warrior did a much better job of bringing the rider with it. The overall fit of the Warrior was better for me, as the rider triangle felt more open. The Warrior is a mix of the Sportster and the Switchback. It has the immense power on tap, but is refined and more comfortable. I was able to ride on on city streets and on the highway, so the experience was fairly complete.
                In the streets, the Warrior feels like a sportbike dressed as a cruiser. It corners well, leaning far before pegs start scraping. The pegs pivot, so there is still room to lean even with scraping pegs. Starting from a stop can be exciting, as the front wheel left the asphalt on several occasions. It handled more sedate riding as well, keeping up with traffic and stopping very well. It stopped so well, in fact, that I was almost rear-ended several times. The air cooling made for some warm stoplights, which is another commonality it has with the Harleys I have tested.
                When I got the bike to the highway, getting it up to speed was easy. Top gear was smooth, with cruising at 70 mph kept the tachometer under 3000 rpm. I was able to get the bike a bit faster than 70 and it tracked straight with no wobble. The seat was a bit uncomfortable, but it was aftermarket and is easily replaceable. The minimal windshield did not stop much of the wind, so the high-speed run was spent crouched as much as possible to avoid a parachute effect. Any significant time on the highway could lead to some rider fatigue.
                My overall opinion of the Warrior is that it is a great bike for people who like to have a sporty experience without the look and costs of a sport bike. As a commuter, though, it is a bit lacking. If a better windshield, bags, and a better seat was added, it could be a passable commuter. If the ride to work is not long, or if you like weekend joy rides, the Warrior is a great machine. As a daily rider, though, it is not as desireable. 

Until next time, keep the rubber side down and your knees in the wind.
Citizen Motorcyclist