Wednesday, July 24, 2013

Citizen Motorcyclist on a 1983 Honda Goldwing Interstate






The time has come for me to cover my own daily driver, a 1983 Honda GL1100i. I remember my dad's Goldwing very well. He would ride it almost every day to and from work. This was very economical, as he worked 55 miles from our home. The route he took was actually a few miles longer than the shortest possible route, but he was able to avoid the famously heavy Southern California traffic. A jaunt up Hwy 74 over the Ortega mountains, then over to the 405 to Fountain Valley. It was a route that was fun and frightening, as the trees covered the sun and the highway ran next to Ricochet Alley, a term given to a creek gulch that was narrow and had steep sides. The winding road was mostly scenic, even with the occasional sharp drop just pass the barrier. I remember being on the back seat on this highway, and the immense joy I felt with the wind on my face.

I suppose these trips gave me the desire to have two wheels of my own. To re-live that nostalgia, as well as have an economical way to and from work, I bought my own Wing. It had been a few years since my last motorcycle, the Harley, and the Goldwing was not a beginner's bike by any means. It is large, heavy, and handles like a pig. At least, that was my opinion the first couple trips. It is still large and heavy, but now I am learning just how nimble it can be. What felt at first like a bike that was too large to be practical has turned into a bike that is starting to feel a bit small. It is physically large and imposing, but I am finding that it has a turning radius that the Harley just can't match. I can do slow-speed u-turns within two parking spots. My Harley was lucky to turn around without crossing four parking spots. I understand that it is because the rake on cruiser forks are considerably more angled, but knowing my huge Wing can out-turn my old small Harley still amuses me. The available power is also nice, but with a large caveat. The power band heavily favors high revs, as the engine has max power at 7,000 rpm and redlines at 8,000 rpm. Torque is also high, but again requires high revs. Getting up to speed is difficult if I keep rpms under 3,000, as there is not enough power to effectively accelerate. Once past 4,000 rpms, though, the speed piles on. The heavy bike pulls like a train even in top gear if you let it. The thing is, I do not like running at high revs. I do not like hearing crotch rockets scream past me, and at high revs my Wing sounds almost like one. Granted, the 4-cylinder engine will not have the familiar cadence of a v-twin. Still, I prefer keeping rpms low as this minimizes strain on and engine and can maximize fuel efficiency. To keep rpms low on the highway, I try to stay around 65 mph. This tends to annoy many drivers behind me, since I ride in the carpool lane. The engine runs consistently smooth, so I am becoming accustomed to the higher rpms.

I find that the more I ride it, the more I like riding it. Riding the freeways has had some unexpected benefits. First, the large bike with the full fairings and bags is imposing to vehicles all around. I am very visible, thanks to my lights and reflectors. Second, riding with a white open-faced helmet and a black jacket makes me look like a motorcycle cop if given a quick glance. Since many motorists are too engrossed with texting, I usually only get a quick glance anyways. Drivers tend to behave better when I am around, which is comforting. I have seen other motorcyclists merge into my lane near me just so they will be in less danger. Usually it is the cruiser riders with loud pipes that join me. The drivers hear his bike and see mine, so that is just extra coverage. While I have had a couple instances where a driver tries to merge into my lane when I am in it, thankfully a quick swerve and a loud horn have prevented problems.

I have had the bike three months now, so I think I am ready to evaluate it fairly.

What I like: Comfort. The Goldwing is like a couch on two wheels. I sit on the bike and the seat is wide enough for support, plus narrow enough to allow me to flat-foot the bike at a stop. The little rise at the back of the driver seat is enough to push against the lower back, offering just that little bit of extra support and comfort. I just recently discovered that the seat is adjustable, just like a car seat. I can slide the seat backwards and forwards. The seat had been all the way forwards, which is why the bike started to feel cramped once I got used to handling it. I moved the seat back all the way, and now it feels more open and comfortable. Sitting upright is easier than ever now. Maintaining good posture is easy, as the seat and handle bar layout almost create a naturally neutral posture. I could easily ride from full tank to full tank and still be able to feel my butt. Goldwings were designed for touring comfort, so this is to be expected. To have it on a bike that is 30 years old is amazing. I also enjoy the radio. The bike is equipped with a Clarion stereo with 4 available presets, clock, and CB radio. There is also an intercom system, but I have neither an intercom in my helmet nor the desire to carry a passenger. Having a headset would be nice for the CB radio, but since I mainly just commute to and from work, listening to the stereo is more than good enough. The bike also has a tape deck, but I have not had an opportunity to test it out.

I also like the power that the engine can create, but only if I rev the engine enough. Highway riding is nice and spirited, as I can keep up with traffic with ease and handle curves very well. I would like to have a sixth gear to reduce rpms when at a constant freeway speed, but I am still happy with what I can get with the bike. I have not yet taxed the available power band of the bike, and yet I have already come close to exceeding my maximum speed when I rode the Shadow 750. There is a good reason that Honda changed the speedometers in my model year. Up to 1982, they maxed at 85 mph. Mine maxes at 150, and I am confident that the bike is mechanically capable of that speed. I have no interest in going that fast on my Wing, so do not worry about that (I am more or less speaking to my wife here...). The engine power, plus the shaft drive, equals a good riding experience.

What I do not like: The Goldwing is a great machine, and I have trouble finding faults. Since nothing is perfect, though, I do have a few negatives to cover. The first I would like to cover is engine power. Yes, I understand that I praised it in some of the preceding paragraphs. While I enjoy how much power it can produce, I do not like that I need to rev the engine high to get it there. I know this blog is not about technical numbers, but I think in this case my point can be made stronger with them. The GL1100 engine produces 81 crank hp at 7,000 rpm and about 64 ft-lbs of torque at 5500 rpm. I typically run my engine between 3,000 and 4,000 rpms on the freeway, so I rarely if ever get to these numbers. I was used to peak torque at low rpms, as v-twins usually provide. With my usual riding style, the engine just does not produce much power. I need to get outside my comfort zone for any real action. I guess there could be a philosophical lesson here, as leaving comforts zones can often create interesting adventures. Still, I have little interest in blowing a 30 year old engine by pushing the redline.

Another negative is the low-speed cooling ability of the radiator. The radiator is in front of the engine, sure, but it is also behind a large front tire and its even larger fender. The air flow getting to the radiator as speeds under 30 mph is anemic, as the temperature needle will gradually climb towards the red. Granted, the fan comes on and is enough to cool the engine even in 110-plus degree weather, but I still dislike seeing that needle get that close to the red. The engine heat is also a negative, as it puts out huge amounts of heat and since heat rises, I am sitting on an 1100cc oven at stoplights. High rpms also produce more heat, which just makes the temperature needle climb faster. Keeping rpms low enough to reduce heating, plus high enough to produce power is a difficult balance in a Phoenix summer.

The last negative I want to cover is the fact that the bike has carbs. It has four carbs, one for each cylinder. I bought the bike and all the carbs had been synched, and they still are. The problem is that carbs make for inconsistent starting in cold weather, even if I use choke. I remember a few cold mornings in April where the bike just did not want to wake up for me until it had 5 minutes to warm up. After that, performance was great. It makes me wonder what I will experience in winter, when temps can get really frigid. It is possible that the bike will be fine, because riding it daily helps keep the fluids flowing and helps prevent problems associated with keeping engines in long-term storage. I am looking forward to getting a fuel-injected bike in the future, but as yet there is no time frame for it.

My opinion on the 1983 GL1100i as a commuter's motorcycle: I think that the specific circumstances of a particular commute will drive the decision, rather than my experiences. If a daily commute consists of mainly highway riding, like what my father had and I have, then it is an excellent choice. If the commute is primarily city streets, then I would suggest an alternate machine, such as the Shadow 750 I reviewed previously. If the commute is a mix of the two, then the best advice I can give is this: If you are OK with high-revving engines, then go for the GL1100. If you prefer having power available at lower rpms, then a different machine would suit you better.

Until my next review, keep the rubber down and your knees in the wind.

Monday, July 22, 2013

Citizen's views of the 2005 Honda Shadow 750 Aero


This review will cover the 2005 Honda Shadow 750. I did not own it. Rather, I borrowed it from a friend to test ride it, and it was quite the test ride. I had a good mix of city, highway, twisties, and slow speed experiences. It has been a few years since I rode, it, but I remember the experience.

The test ride took me all over Arizona. Started in Phoenix and went to Payson. From there we went to Show Low. Next was Globe, then back to Phoenix. The route was through the deserts, across mountains, and through several valleys. From Phoenix to Payson was a great introduction to the bike. We rode east on surface streets for about 10 miles. The weather was cool and the sky was clear. The ride down Shea Blvd to the main highway let me explore the rev range of the bike, as well as it braking power. The bike's calm demeanor was very welcoming, and this continued when we got on to Highway 87 to Payson. Many parts of Highway 87 are nice and flat with gentle curves. I learned how to corner on the bike, which behaved a little differently because of the shaft drive. I was used to a chain drive, which has noticeable differences in behavior. Once I became accustomed to the shaft drive, however, it became apparent how beneficial it was. Chain-driven rear wheels are very responsive to throttle changes. The noise of the chain and the slight vibrations it causes are ever-present, and stronger at high speeds. The shaft drive was smoother, quieter, and smoother with throttle changes. The elevation gain to Payson was modest, and the carbs kept up with the altitude. Payson is only about a mile high, so the bike did not have any strain. Payson to Show Low was a different story, as it showed areas in which the bike is weak. The road to Show Low, the 260, is curvy and full of hills. The biggest challenge was the ascent up the Mogollon Rim, which is over 7000 ft high. The 260 tops out at just under 8,000 ft a few miles after the Rim is behind you. The air is thin and cold. Snow piles still littered the shoulder and the forest beyond was a mix of green and white. My leathers kept me warm, so I was happy. The bike, however, was not. The thin air led to a noticeable drop in power. I had a hard time making 70 mph on straight and level parts of the road, and 70 was a nice dream going uphill. Eventually, though, we made it to Show Low. From Show Low to Globe was mostly downhill, and we made excellent time on the 60. Parts of it were curvier than I thought and I scraped the pegs a time or two. No damage to the bike, thankfully. The Salt River valley was beautiful, and the elevation was low enough for the engine to take full breaths. The road back up the valley was nice and uneventful. From Globe to Phoenix, still on the 60, was an opportunity to see how well the bike behaves at high speed. I will not say how fast I got it to, but I was able to keep up with some of the sportier bikes in the group. All in all, it was a great ride and gave me an appreciation for what Honda can do.

What I liked: The shaft drive is what I liked best. Smooth and quiet, with no chain links or sprockets to get fouled up. The transmission was also nice. It was more closely spaced that my Harley's 4-speed, but the 5th gear was taller than my 4th gear and the final drive ratio was also better, in my opinion. The revs were high at 70 mph, but at least I did not feel like the engine was going to shake itself apart. I was able to use my mirrors without engaging the clutch and coasting the bike, which was what my Harley needed. Speaking of the clutch, I liked how it had a very light pull. Two fingers was enough for quick gear shifts. Fuel efficiency was also nice, as I averaged 55 mpg for the whole trip. The bike's slow speed handling was also great, as negotiating parking lots and gas stations was done with ease. Street riding was where the bike seemed to be in its element. Sure, highway riding was nice and comfy, but the nice torque curve and good brakes made for easy stoplight hopping.

What I did not like: Engine power, especially at high altitudes. This bike is not designed to melt asphalt, sure, but a little extra power would make getting up to highway speeds easier. Except for this, I really have no problems with the bike. It is designed for commuters and it does a superb job. It may not win many speed races, but it is very well suited to getting a person from point A to point B.

My overall opinion: The Honda Shadow is an excellent choice for somebody who commutes on two wheels who also enjoys a nice jaunt out of town. As long as that jaunt does not involve hills at high altitude, the rider should have no problems with this bike. New models include fuel injection, which may negate some of the high-altitude problems I referenced here. If I ever get a chance to try one out, I will certainly let you know here.

My next review: 1983 Honda Goldwing Interstate

Saturday, July 20, 2013

My first ride: a 1982 Harley Sportster.



This is my first post to review the usefulness of a particular motorcycle. I think I will use my first ride, a 1982 Harley Sportster. I got it second-hand, so the unknown maintenance habits of the previous owner(s) may play a role in this opinion. Being my first ride, I did not know what to expect at first, but the year or so I had it taught me many things about riding. This opinion will be both objective and subjective, so feel free to share what you think.

The good: Power. The bike had plenty of grunt when you added the go-juice. It had an S&S carb, which improved air flow into the engine. It also had Cobra pipes, which helped air flow out of the engine. Better breathing leads to better volumetric efficiency, which equates to better power. Yes, many performance bikes would eat it for breakfast, but it was still plenty powerful enough to get moving at highway speeds. The bike's forward controls helped keep the legs stretched to avoid cramping. Being a Sportster, the emphasis was on sport. Lean angles were nice and I had to make an effort to find the touch-down limits. Lines were held nicely through curves, and parking lots were easy to navigate. Brakes were nice, but the rear tire had a habit of locking up when braking was a bit too eager. Another thing I liked was the volume. The bike was calm and nice when idling or under light loads. Twist that throttle, pull hard from a stoplight, and the pipes roared with enough volume to get attention. My friend's custom pipes on his cruiser were loud, but mine were deafening. There is an adage that loud pipes save lives. There is debate on that, but I can be reasonably sure that the sound of my pipes helped to remind people that bikers are always around.

The bad: Maintenance. Simply put, the upkeep on the machine was murder on my wallet. I did not have a service history for the machine, so I don't know all that had been done in the 25 years or so since it was built. Oil leaks, chain squeaks, and carb problems reduced the fun factor. A lot. I get that older Harleys leak oil. The series of bad gaskets, though, were a bit much. Another thing I did not enjoy was that a lowering kit had been installed, as the previous owner was a short women. Suspension travel suffered, and rolling down bumpy streets was torture. Vibration, too, was a problem. At idle, the gentle rumble was nice and relaxing. At speed, though, was a different story. I could not use my mirrors on the freeway. The shaking was so bad that the mirrors actually sheared off one day. If I wanted to see my mirrors at 70 mph, I had to disengage the clutch and coast along while the mirrors settled down enough for me to get a clear picture. Part of that is due to the 4-speed gearbox. If I went much past 55 I was wishing for a 5th gear. The scream at 75 was disconcerting, but I have recently learned that the engine is designed for high revs. I didn't like the sound or the feel of that engine revving that high.

How I used the bike: I mostly used it for commuting to and from work. Roughly 25 miles each way, mostly by freeway. The seat was uncomfortable, but I will not list as a pro or a con. Seats are interchangeable, and I just chose to keep it. I also took the bike on short trips, such as to Payson and back and to Tortilla Flat. Highway 88 is fun, as long as you do not get stuck behind boat trailers or RVs... I would have liked to have taken it more places, but I was afraid of a break-down far from home. All in all, I put 10,000 miles on the bike.

My opinion: Would this bike make a good choice for a daily rider? Yes, with some caveats. First, restore the original height of the bike. Second, making sure the gaskets are good at all likely fail points. In other words, closer to a stock Sportster would make for a very good daily driver. It was good on streets and highways, did not have many odd behaviors, and was fun for short and long trips. If you have the time and resources to keep the oil leaks under control, I would recommend the bike.

Up next: A 2005 Honda Shadow 750.

Friday, July 19, 2013

Intro to the Blog

This is my new blog. In this blog I will be covering the joy of motorcycling. I understand that yes, there are other blogs that also cover motorcycles that offer technical reviews, performance data, and a lot of good information about the bikes. What I want to do is show the usefulness of different motorcycles for people who ride regularly, if not daily. Weekend warriors who ride only on weekends with good weather are not my target demographic. If you are the kind of person who is on two wheels in the middle of summer, the middle of winter, and the middle of nowhere, then this blog can be for you. I promise that my opinions are honest. Also, my opinions are just that. If you, the reader, decide that you have a different idea of a bike's usefulness, please share your opinion. I just ask that you do so in a respectful manner, with some attempt at correct grammar and spelling. You don't text and ride, so don't use text speak here. 

Thank you and happy riding!
Citizen Motorcyclist